Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Huff Pam Cooking Spray

Unbelievable oracle internet-tools: Still do not know



Candy Cigarettes



You're a total badass, but you do do not taste very good.






You Are Scary



You even scare scary people Sometimes!






Your Monster Profile



Basilisk Warrior



You Feast On: Coffee



You Lurk Around In: Sewers



You Especially Like to Torment: Crybabies



This is so real it's scary!

Cover Letter Visual Merchandiser

Pt 02 (made in the thigh)

Hmm .. issue that always gives "cloth to manga" ...

Somehow I always try to avoid "the laws of man "(in the sense of" to do by imposing "and not by reflection). However, as not believe a church, also try to avoid" the law of God. "Nevertheless, I live in society and therefore, some kind behavior is subject to laws "imposed" (which is the custom, education, constitution or otherwise) I have. I think it is inevitable (at least at first).

But, for once, I am, here once again, facing a situation of existential dilemma (oh, how I'm deep): If someone disappoints you, treats you with disrespect, or frustrate their expectations, to be simpler, it makes you lose a little of that special respect (no respect for the human being "human being") that you have someone that you chose a circle around you than most people, like (re) act in relation to that person thereafter?

First. Let's clarify: About

disappointment: This disappointment does not occur solely in accordance with the expectations created by the individual? Namely, you disappoint with something after their own expectations. Even though there is some kind of say "cultural expectation," she may or may not be accepted. About

respect: When you "host" someone to an inner circle, given that there is a special consideration (an extreme hypothetical situation: you save the life of a friend or a total stranger?) there is also a special respect.

Thinking in terms of concentric circles; The larger the radius the smaller "special respect". Logo, um total desconhecido, tem (da minha parte) somente o respeito que eu tenho por ele ser humano. If a friend or someone closer, beyond this point, there is "something else". There is a special respect and particular.

Returning: know someone, we give a special meaning, we create some kind of expectation from the experience we have with this person, there is disappointment (not start me on trial. We all assumed. Otherwise we would not view). And now? Probably this person is a circle of larger radius. In the case of some kind of attitude that might "hurt her," how to act? Should we care so much about to do what we want not just a matter of respect (I'm not talking now, in extreme cases)?

If someone like to sometimes stop doing things we want because it might hurt her. Similarly (and I think the result, in a sense, is the same), doing things that do not only want to do well in that one (watching romantic comedies say something?).

So do or not do?

not really like the idea of "eye for eye, tooth for tooth" but on the other hand, forgiveness / absolution did not please me. I do not like that I apologize. I feel that if I say "sorry" the person will feel free to do it again.

The process seems almost always the same: The cause harm to B, B feel discontent, feeling guilty, apologizes A, B forgives, forgets A, B, do not forget, The cause other damage to B and so on.

is not the case to be vindictive or extremist, but the first time the mouse takes the shock, he hesitates at the fifth, tenth in it takes no more shock. The question is: What if the tenth time not hover mouse shock and lost opportunity. Of course there is a predisposition to behavior, but the events are isolated. But our views were unchanged. However, there is again the expectation. Apparently it's impossible not to expect the tenth shock.

A question I ask myself (if anyone knows answer me) is: If the mouse A "learn" not to take the shock before the mouse B this means that the mouse is the most intelligent (or any kind of superiority) the mouse B?

Anyway, the question remains:

"I will do for you"

"I will not do for you"

Until when is valid?

Friday, November 11, 2005

How To Make A Curly Ribbon Hair Bow

From objectivity to subjectivity, truth to opinion.

other day there was a doubt about the kind of speech to be used in a dissertation. Not about what speech should be employed, but on the objective discourse itself.

This question arose when I made the comparison between objectivity and subjectivity.

Apparently there is a difference of degree between them. If the speech is a subjective "think" about the theme in a speech goal is "authoritarianism." You exchange the "think" by "is." The dictionary has

dissertation by the scrutiny of a particular subject. However, this test refers in respect of a writing, exclusively to their own opinion of the author, since, if it is not a scientific thesis, both experience (empirical) and mathematical proof are not used.

If both are not used then the speech itself is merely a rhetorical exercise and the author's argument is necessarily subject to its subjectivity.

However, it can be argued that this "opinion" arises from the author's personal experience, and this can be understood as empirical (I know that if A then B because I witnessed the phenomenon) or even substantiated by quotes from renowned authors (one author says that if A then B).

However, these statements are not true.

Even if we treat the personal experience and empirical experience (and that the truth would serve as confirmation of the proposal in the speech), the relationship between opinion (taken as true) and not direct experience.

not direct because the whole experience gets to our right (and therefore to our ability to scan) through the senses and these senses function as filters (see the different shades for a bee and a human). If filters are, then what comes to our reason is only a portion of the truth. Based on this "piece of the truth" the survey takes place essentially in the comparison of this phenomenon with other phenomena (A for B, over C, etc.). That is, plots compared to plots of real truth.

Therefore, this test would only be complete (ie it would be a fact) the comparison is absolute (in the whole compared to all).

Likewise, citations not serve as grounds for the truth, for they can only have been written in the same way (using the experience or other citations).

And even though the author, the dissertation, use all sorts of arguments (experiences, quotes, math, science, rhetoric, etc.), this would be insufficient. Still not reach the field of truth. Continue in the field of view. Otherwise, if in possession of the truth (and I believe we have not), science would be complete and there would be nothing more to be discovered or researched; philosophy would have found the latter argument and could no longer be disputed, the mathematical instrument would be the final and definitive; there was only "quoting", the rhetoric would be extinguished.

Therefore, our objectivity is always subject to our subjectivity and our truth will always be an authoritative opinion.